|
"Are you not entertained?"
If
grey is your favorite color, then Gladiator should knock your socks
off. Director Ridley Scott fairly bleeds most scenes of all but the most
metallic colors, perhaps indicative of the purgatorial outlook of the
former Roman general Maximus (Russell Crowe) who, after losing everyone
he loves by the treachery of his superiors, stands poised between craving
vengeance in this life and yearning to join his family in the next. Gladiator
offers up a possible explanation for the murder in 192 A.D. of the Emperor
Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix), painting the young Caesar as morally bereft
and unwise enough to cross Maximus, whom Commodus' dying father, Marcus
Aurelius (Richard Harris), trusted far more and hoped might succeed him.
Commodus' jealousy sparks betrayals and bloodbaths upon his ascension
to the throne, and threatens to plunge Rome headlong into decadence and
decline, were one of his victims not the Empire's greatest general with
an itch for revenge. With
its visual delights and the intensity of Crowe's performance, Gladiator
might have qualified as a solidly entertaining Roman epic. But if history
played out with as many narrative potholes as erodes this film, then life
is strange and incomprehensible indeed. Plausibility is repeatedly sacrificed
at the altar of dramatic effect, such as when we're supposed to believe
Maximus rides horseback all the way from Germany to Spain and just misses
his family's gruesome execution by minutes (allowing Crowe an opportunity
to turn on the water-and-snotworks). Then a slave caravan just happens
to be passing by his pillaged house soon afterwards, and snatches the
defeated Maximus en route to a gladiator academy in the Middle East. It's
all too unlikely, and feels like a throwback to the sometimes simpler
narrative strategies of earlier films - can anyone say Spartacus?
- whose parallels with this film are only beginning. Equally
disappointing is Scott's carelessness in trying to flesh out the character
of Maximus. We are introduced in the film's opening battle to what is
apparently his faithful & fearsome German Shepherd, some sort of bond
between the two intimated by repeatedly significant glances between them,
but the hound is never seen again. We also repeatedly witness Maximus
ritualistically scooping up and smelling some of the earth upon which
he will be fighting yet another opponent, but no explanation for such
a tic is ever forthcoming. Scott far too often abandons opportunities
to gain some insight into this seemingly unbeatable warrior; it's quite
possible the script pursued these dimensions, only to be edited out after
shooting to keep the film (just) below three hours. It
is this oversimplification of events that lends an air of invincibility
to Crowe as he makes his way to the Coliseum in Rome, and the triumphant
ending feels all too inevitable, as if telegraphed from the very beginning.
Stripped of most anything that might render Maximus human except for his
pain and loss, we get the impression that he could take out the most fearsome
gladiators on his worst day, which is exactly what he does one by one,
robbing the final showdown with Commodus of any trace of suspense. The
only question is who else might be left standing after the Emperor's paranoia
expands its murderous reach. The
blurry battle scenes are largely unintelligible due to too-rapid cutting
and a hyperactive camera, and Scott paradoxically presents less relevant
scenes in slow-motion, such as Commodus merely stepping out of his carriage
very
.slowly. (This negligence renders
completely unclear how Maximus escaped execution in the first place.)
Things do get exhilarating when the tigers are loosed in the arena, or
any time Oliver Reed (as Maximus' gladiator mentor) or Richard Harris
enters the frame, and the various dialogues of political intrigue provide
all the cast with amply dramatic showcases. But the Braveheart
comparisons of one skilled fighter against those who rule the land come
too easily and often, so the excellent performances and the CGI skyline
of Rome are pretty much all we can enjoy afresh. Gladiator will
suffice as historical pageant, but if you're seeking to pass three hours
in a way worthy of the history books, you might do better to stick with
something more like a book. |
|||||||
|
|||||||